Is it just me, or does it seem that if I offer any comments that could be even remotely construed as Negative to old iron going overseas, certain other folks at other places loose their minds and go on the attack.
Case in point, I was commenting about a person who sandblasted and painted a boiler PRIOR to doing a UT mapping ( the person stated that a UT was still to be done)..what I said was that it is getting the cart before the horse. I also offered the very truthful observation that most inspectors look at the owner as much as the boiler (rightly or wrongly), and that worrying about paint before proper boiler inspection and repair will make most inspectors question priorities.
One person basically said that it was none of my business, and another went on some wierdo tangient on how much more thorough European inspections are and how good shot blasting and zinc coating is.
Right now, all I am concerned with is making sure that some one that has more money than sense (or experience) doesn't pull another You Know Where Ohio on us...with the new appendix C out, the ball is now in our court. And even if something happens overseas, it will give the wrong people the right ammunition. I have too much of my life invested in steam power for some overseas trust fund baby to screw it up.

